Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Time to check health of your portfolio
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
50 Ways to Improve Your Finances in 2013
Monday, January 16, 2012
Neighbours are not financial wizards
- Goals, time horizon will differ
- Risk-taking ability will differ
- Financial commitments will differ
- Age group may differ
- They share successes, not failures
- ...then, why follow them?
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Delays are costly in retirement planning
People exceedingly depend on provident funds and fixed deposits to provide for their requirements post retirement.
Sunday, November 20, 2011
7 Golden rules of retirement
The first rule of retirement planning is also the easiest to follow. If you have a regular job, then 12% of your basic salary and an equal contribution by your employer that flows into your Provident Fund account is a good way to build a nest egg. The best thing about this option is that you cannot avoid it. EPF rules require all employees to contribute 12% of their basic income to retiral savings, which include the Employee Provident Fund and the Family Pension Fund. It is a forced saving that becomes the default retirement plan for many individuals.
SMART TIP:
Start an SIP in a mutual fund and automate the process by giving an ECS mandate to your bank. In this way, your retirement planning will stay on track.
2. Increase investment as your income grows
According to recruitment firm ABC Consultants , India Inc hiked salaries by 12-15 % in 2011. By how much did your income go up? More importantly , did you step up the quantum of your investments accordingly? Not many people do that. Sure, inflation has been on the rise and most of this year's increment would have been nullified by the increase in the cost of living. But even when there is a marked increase in the investible surplus, people don't match their investments with the increase in income.
SMART TIP:
Whenever you get a raise, allocate half of it to savings. You might not notice the change since you will be enjoying the other half of the raise.
3. Don't dip into corpus before you retire
This might sound weird, but every time you change jobs, your retirement planning is at a grave risk. This is because you have the option to withdraw your PF balance at that time or transfer it to the account with the new employer. Besides, there is the option to withdraw your PF amount if you need the money for specific purposes, including your child's marriage, buying or building a house, or in medical emergencies . Dipping into the corpus before you retire prevents your money to gain from the power of compounding. Don't underestimate what this can do to your retirement savings over the long term. A person with a basic salary of 25,000 a month at the age of 25 can accumulate 1.65 crore in the PF over a period of 35 years. This is based on the assumption that his income will rise by 10% every year.
The sudden flush of liquidity can trigger a spending spree and ill-planned decisions that can cripple your financial planning. Often, the money goes into discretionary spending, which means your retirement planning is back at square one. A late start means a smaller corpus even if you start investing more.
SMART TIP:
Instead of withdrawing your EPF balance when you change jobs, transfer it to the new account by filling 'Form 13' and submitting it to the new employer. This should be at the top in your list of priorities at the new workplace.
4. Withdraw 5% a year initially, then step up
One of the biggest challenges for tomorrow's retirees is to ensure that they don't outlive their savings. This is a distinct possibility because of two major factors: rising cost of living and an increase in life expectancy. High inflation, in fact, is enemy no. 1 for the retired investor. Sure, the inflation rate will not remain as high as it is right now. However, over 20 years, even a nominal inflation of 6% will reduce the value of 1 crore to 29 lakh. Besides, Indians are living longer. Life expectancy rose from 61.3 years in 2000 to 66.46 years in 2010. By 2020, the average Indian can expect to live till 72 years. In urban areas, where people have better access to healthcare, and in higher income groups, the life expectancy could extend beyond 80 years.
The problem arises because most Indians are not comfortable with the idea of drawing down from their corpus. There is an overarching desire to leave something behind for their heirs and dependents. Given the inability of a corpus to beat inflation in the long run, the retirees should be prepared for a depletion of their corpus.
SMART TIP:
You can safely draw down half the inflation-adjusted appreciation every year. If the portfolio has earned 12%, you can easily withdraw 6%.
5. 100 - age = Your allocation to stocks
An investment portfolio's performance is determined more by its asset allocation than by the returns from individual investments or market timing. How much you have when you attend your last day at work will depend on how you divided your retirement savings between stocks, fixed income and other asset classes. Experts recommend that you should have an equity exposure of 100 minus your age. So, at 30, you should have about 70% of your portfolio in equities. At 55, the exposure to this volatile asset class should have been pared down to 45%. After you retire, your exposure to stocks should not be more than 25-30 % of your portfolio.
This is not a hard and fast rule and should also take into account the financial situation of the individual. It assumes that all people at a certain age will have the same risk appetite . This is not true. A 45-year-old person with a good income and few dependants will be able to take on more risk than someone who is 30 but has a low and unsteady income.
SMART TIP:
Invest in asset allocation funds that redistribute the corpus depending on the age of the investor. As he grows older, the exposure to equity is progressively reduced.
6. Borrow for education, save for retirement
Indian parents love to save for their children. Whether it is for their education or marriage, or even to provide them with a comfortable life, children are the biggest motivators of savings in the country. But before you pour money into a child plan, make sure your retirement savings target has been met. In an effort to fulfil the needs of the child, Indian parents sometimes sacrifice more than they should. Some even dip into their retirement funds to pay for the child's education. This is risky because your retirement is going to be very different from that of the previous generations . It will be entirely funded by you and won't have the cushion of defined benefits.
SMART TIP:
An education loan helps inculcate financial discipline in the child. If he is responsible for the repayment, he gets into the saving habit early in life.
7. Save 20 times your annual expenses
This rule is different from others because it is based on how much you spend, not on how much your investments earn. Knowing your post-retirement expenses is crucial to retirement planning. Some expenses, such as those on clothing and entertainment, come down. Others, such as transportation, medicine and insurance, go up. Add up all the expenses you are likely to incur after retirement to know how much you will need per month. Then, multiply this amount by 240 to know how much should be your retirement corpus.
SMART TIP:
Buy a health insurance cover that continues till you are 70-75 years old. It is difficult to buy one afresh when you are older and not so healthy.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
When Fund manager changes, Monitor the fund carefully
This is a bit of a problem. You see, unlike some funds in the more mature markets, the fund manager is not really a brand in India. People generally invest in a particular fund because it has done well. Or, if they are beginners, they are likely to invest because the fund company is a big brand like ICICI or HDFC or Reliance. At some point, those investors interested in learning how mutual funds work come to know that investment decisions for each fund are taken by a fund manager.
And then they hear a fund manager has changed. This happens a lot. Over the last 24 months alone, there have been 187 fund manager changes for equity funds. The total equity assets managed by the Indian fund industry is Rs2 lakh crore. Over the last 24 months, there has been a change in fund managers handling about Rs98,000 crore - almost half of the total industry.
Is this a problem? Is this something that investors should worry about? Unfortunately, the only reasonable answer is that it depends. It's actually quite hard to figure out quantitatively how much of an impact a change in a fund manager has had on a fund. All equity funds are managed within a context of their investment mandate, their institutional parentage and, obviously, the market conditions. Pin-pointing the exact impact of these factors and that of a fund manager is impossible.
There have been a few cases when a fund manager's exit has led to a slump in funds' performance. However, there have been some cases when a new fund manager has proven to be better than the old one. At the end of the day, there is little in it except to say that when a fund manager changes, investors have to be extra vigilant in monitoring their fund for any changes in performance.
That still leaves investors with the question of why is there such a flux. Why are there so many changes in the management of funds? One reason is that there is generally a lot of flux in all sort of skill based jobs in India. Like any other white-collar job in a growing industry (and especially in financial services), changing jobs is a major way of moving up in one's profession. It's unfortunate that the managements of fund companies are unable to create conditions in which this is not the case, but that's the way it happens.
The other issue is of good fund managers themselves moving up the ladder into marketing and general management jobs to move up in their professions. I've seen this happen time and time again in the fund industry. Once a fund manager gets a good track record, he seems to spend more and more time talking to investors (at least the bigger ones) than on proper fund management.
This is basically a selling job. Or, he's expected to start managing and mentoring junior fund managers, regardless of whether the junior is actually any good at it.
Eventually, he gets out of fund management altogether and becomes CXO, for some value of X. This is great for his career and the way most corporate careers work. However, perhaps fund management jobs should follow a different model, like that of surgeons may be. You don't hear of a good surgeon moving forward in his career by abandoning surgery and becoming a hospital administrator, do you?
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/mutual-funds/analysis/when-fund-manager-changes-monitor-the-fund-carefully/articleshow/9351703.cms?curpg=2
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Benefit from flexibility of multi-cap funds
When you put your money in an equity mutual fund, do you also tell the fund manager which stocks to buy? No, and yes. While investors don't give any instructions, a fund with a fixed investment mandate picks only those type of stocks.
For instance, a large-cap fund will invest only in index-based heavyweights and other blue chips. You won't find a small-cap company in its portfolio. This is why large-cap funds tend to move slowly and surely compared with other categories. Similarly, a small-cap fund will focus on smaller companies, forever hoping to zero in on the next Infosys that will turn it into a multibagger.
Multi-cap diversified equity funds have given higher returns
On the other hand, multi-cap funds invest across the entire spectrum of stocks, starting from large-caps all the way down to small-caps. They have a flexible mandate, which helps them pick winners from across market capitalisations.
"Wealth creation happens when the fund management process has flexibility. Multi-cap funds have an in-built mandate to capture the upside across the market spectrum," says Om Ahuja, head of private wealth management and strategy at Emkay Global Financial Services.
The performance of multi-cap diversified equity funds bears this out. In the past three and five years, this category has given higher returns than those from other categories of diversified funds.
Multi-cap funds are the best long term investment option for creating wealth
As companies belonging to different market segments demonstrate different levels of volatility and returns, it is best for investors to hold stocks of varying market capitalisations.
"Multi-cap funds provide the investors with the offer to build a diversified portfolio by giving them access to all kinds of equities," says KN Sivasubramanian, chief investment officer, Franklin Templeton Investments.
For instance, in the past one year, mid- and small-cap funds have done exceedingly well, but in the long-term, multi-cap funds have consistently outperformed the other categories. "Multi-cap funds are the best investment option for creating wealth in the long term," points out Ahuja.
Work in all market conditions
The flexible mandate of multi-cap funds gives them access to greener pastures in all market conditions. At the beginning of a bullish phase, it is usually the large-cap bellwether stocks that do well. Midway through the bull run, these large-cap stocks reach high valuations and the focus of the investing community shifts to mid-cap and then finally small-cap stocks.
"Retail investors cannot gauge which part of the market will perform well-large-caps, mid-cap or small caps. By investing in multi-cap funds, they can gain in all market conditions," says Saurabh Jain, associate vice-president, retail equities research, SMC Global Securities.
In financial crisis, a multi-cap fund will be able to bear redemption pressures The 'go anywhere' strategy works well during downturns as well. "While a given set of conditions may not benefit one part of the multi-cap fund portfolio, it could benefit the other, thereby creating a counter-balance effect that generates long-term results," says Maneesh Kumar, managing director, Burgeon Wealth Advisors. When the bears are on the prowl, small-cap and mid-cap stocks fall harder than large-caps. Multi-cap funds are able to cushion themselves better than funds which are focused only on these vulnerable segments.
A deft fund manager can realign the fund's portfolio rapidly and thus benefit from the changing market mood. "Besides, in a black swan kind of a scenario, such as the financial crisis that we experienced in 2008, a multi-cap fund will be able to bear redemption pressures better compared with a mid- and small-cap fund as it is likely to be more liquid," adds Kumar.
We looked at the performance of the top 15 multi-cap funds during a bull phase and a bearish phase. Except for three instances out of the 30 observations, the multi-cap funds outperformed their benchmarks. Most of the funds outperformed their benchmarks in both the bear and bull phases.
"Multi-cap funds have delivered in all kinds of environments and market sentiments. It is true especially for the top performing ones in the category," says Vinod Sharma, head of private broking and wealth management at HDFC Securities. Apart from the freedom to invest in stocks of any market capitalisation, multi cap funds are also not shackled by any particular investing style.
These funds can benefit from both value and growth investing, depending on their objectives. "This is because the fund manager can pick from a much larger population of stocks," says Sharma. For instance, Franklin India Flexi Cap Fund is a multi-cap fund and follows a bottom-up approach to stock selection.
The fund's investment objective is to provide investors with a blend of growth and value investment options. The focus is more on individual companies and their potential to create wealth over the long term.
Betting on the fund manager's ability
The fund manager's ability to select stocks is crucial to the success of a mutual fund. However, this becomes even more critical in case of a multi-cap fund. "Investing in a multi-cap fund is akin to investing on the fund manager's capabilities," says Jain.
This is because the risk levels of a multi-cap fund can rapidly change, which requires deft handling by the manager.
Not only does he have to monitor a larger universe of stocks, but the possibility of making the wrong choice widens due to the freedom granted to him.
If he fails to read the market conditions correctly or is not able to change the allocation of the fund's portfolio, the returns are likely to fall behind. The multi-cap fund manager must also manage his sectoral allocations well. Sectors tend to move in cycles and he should be able to change his allocations depending on the economic cycle. This is why multi-cap funds carry a higher risk than index funds or large-cap funds. Look up the fund manager's track record carefully before you invest in one.
Since multi-cap funds have a larger universe of stocks to buy from, their churn also tends to be higher than that of other fund categories. The average portfolio turnover of the multi-cap funds is 79%, while that of large-cap and mid- and small-cap funds are 73% and 64%, respectively. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how frequently assets were bought and sold in a fund by the manager during the course of a year.
The higher the turnover rate, the higher will be the transaction or trading costs for the fund. Although these costs are not included in the fund's expense ratio, they are paid for by the investors' money, not the fund manager's salary. Thus, funds with higher portfolio turnover eat away into the returns. Over the long term, this can affect the returns from the fund significantly.
The churn does not seem to be so abnormal
However, experts don't see this as a significant drawback as long as the fund is able to generate the returns that justify the higher costs. "The churn does not seem to be so abnormal," says Sharma.
Besides, churning depends on the style of investing as well. Both the DSPBR Equity and the Templeton India Equity Income funds are multi-cap schemes. While the former has a portfolio turnover of 216%, the latter's measurement is only 3.49% as it functions on value investing.
"Churning depends on the style of investment. Also, a higher portfolio-turnover need not always lead to higher costs. If the individual bets work, the gains can easily more than cover the trading costs," says Sivasubramanian.
Another drawback of multi-cap funds is that fund managers are somewhat reluctant to allocate a higher percentage of corpus to small- and mid-cap companies. Hence, they are not able to effectively capitalise on the USP of the category. "At the time of redemption pressure, it is difficult to exit mid- and small-cap stocks. Due to liquidity concerns, a multi-cap fund manager may exhibit a large-cap bias to be on the safe side," says Kumar. The non-availability of information could be another reason why the exposure to small-cap and mid-cap stocks is restricted.
However, die-hard fans of multi-cap funds defend the category. "Although one can contend that they could have been more aggressive, the superior returns generated by multi-cap funds belie these allegations. Besides, a rise in the ratio of small-caps in the overall allocation can augment the fund's inherent risk," says Sharma. Experts believe that it is too early to draw any inference about multi-cap funds. "Pure multi-cap funds are rather new in the Indian market. Hence, any evaluation would be unfair as the funds have essentially been around for one market cycle," says Sivasubramanian.
Should you invest?
Multi-cap funds are not of much utility for investors who understand asset allocation and base their investment decisions on it.
"It becomes difficult for investors who follow asset allocation principles to ascertain as to how these funds will fit in their portfolios as these virtually buy anything irrespective of capitalisation or sector," says Kumar. Asset allocation is the most important factor determining a portfolio's performance.
Multi-cap funds make an excellent investment option
Studies show that 94% of the portfolio's returns variance is determined by how funds are spread across asset classes. Only a small portion is determined by market timing and security selection.
Rakesh Rawal, head of private wealth management at Anand Rathi Financial Services, says that if you have a large portfolio, the asset allocation call is best taken between the investor and the financial adviser. In such cases, multi-cap funds lose their relevance. "However, if you have a small portfolio, then multi-cap funds make an excellent investment option," he adds.
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/quickiearticleshow/9258055.cms
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Growth or dividend option? Let cash flow needs, tax outgo help you decide
While investing in mutual fund schemes, investors can choose from the dividend or growth option. When it comes to fixed income funds, both the options have certain advantages. But there are some factors to be considered before you make your choice.
CASH FLOW NEEDS
The primary criterion for choosing an option is cash flow requirements .
If there is no interim cash flow requirement, the growth option is better; in this option, the returns are reflected in the movement of the NAV. There are also no hassles in investing the interim cash flows. If there is requirement for interim cash flows from the investment , then the dividend option is better. The frequency of the dividends would be as per the requirements of the investor and the availability of the dividend frequency options (monthly, quarterly, etc) in the fund.
The asset management company (AMC) endeavours to maintain the stated dividend frequency, subject to availability of distributable surplus.
TAX TREATMENT
The other relevant parameter is the tax efficiency of the returns being taken home through the dividend and growth options. Dividends are tax-free in the hands of the investor, but there is a dividend distribution tax (DDT) that is deducted by the AMC on behalf of the investor and passed on to the government.
The rate of the DDT in case of liquid funds is 25% (plus surcharge/cess). For non-liquid fixed income funds, there are two rates of DDT: for individual /HUF investors, it is 12.5% (plus surcharge/cess) and for corporate investors, the rate is 20% (plus surcharge/cess). From June 1, the DDT rate for corporate investors has gone up to 30% for all categories of fixed income funds. In the growth option, the gains are taxable in the hands of the investor, ie, there is no distribution tax. As per the current tax laws, the growth option taxation depends on the holding period: returns from mutual fund units held for a period of less than a year are called short-term capital gains (STCG), and from holdings of more than a year are long-term capital gains (LTCG).
STCG is taxable at the slab rates for individuals; most investors nowadays are in the highest tax bracket of 30% (plus cess). In case of LTCG, the investor has the choice of paying the incometax either at 10% (plus cess) without taking the benefit of cost inflation index or at 20% (plus cess) after taking the benefit of cost indexation. As we see from the tax structure , as per the current tax laws, the choice of dividend/growth option should be based on the intended holding period.
For a horizon of less than a year, the dividend option is better as the individual DDT rate of 12.5% (plus surcharge/cess) is lower than the STCG rate of 30% (plus cess). The only exception to this would be an individual who is in the 10% tax slab, for whom the STCG tax rate would be lower, but that would be a rare case. For a horizon of more than a year, the growth option is preferable , as the 10% (without indexation ) rate is lower than the current DDT rates. The investor should opt for the 20% rate only if the net tax incidence (with indexation benefit) is lower than the 10% rate.
EFFECTS OF DTC
So far so good, in that the choice between dividend and growth options is based on cash flow requirements and tax efficiency.
The grey area comes with the proposed Direct Tax Code (DTC), scheduled to be implemented from April 1, 2012. It is a grey area because at this point of time, it is aproposalwhichisyettobemade into law and may undergo changes by the time it is implemented. As per the proposals, the returns from the dividend option will be clubbed with the income of the investor (ie, there would be no distribution tax) and would be taxable at the slab rates.
In the growth option, there would be no distinction between short-term and long-term holdings as such, but the benefit of indexation would be applicable for a holding period of one year from the end of the financial year in which the asset is acquired . The taxation on the growth option would be as per the slab rates, which means 30% for most investors. Since both dividend and growth options would be taxable at the hands of the investor, there would not be much of a difference in terms of taxation except where the intended holding period would be enough to be eligible for indexation benefit. In that case, the growth option would be more tax efficient.
Joydeep Sen
(CFP, Sr Vice-President – Advisory Desk BNP Paribas Wealth Management)
Source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-07-06/news/29743785_1_dividend-distribution-tax-dividend-option-growth-option/2
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
'Living too long a serious threat to Indians'
The panel, headed by GN Bajpai, looking into revitalizing the National Pension System has recommended that these entities be paid a commission of up to 0.5% of the investment. In an interview with TOI, Bajpai speaks on why the product, despite being the best for retirement savings, needs to be pushed.
The panel has said that financial products have to be pushed.
Any financial product in India has to be sold as nobody queues up for buying any financial insurance product. Have you seen anybody queuing up to buy insurance or mutual funds? That is the ethos of this country. The NPS is a wonderful product, it is the equivalent of pure desi ghee and we have not tampered with the product at all. But it still has to be pushed. Pension is a time bomb which is ticking in Indian society. Without protection, retirees will ultimately become dependent on society.
Your recommendation for ad valorem charges comes at a time when markets like UK are moving away from commissions.
In UK and the West, pension has become a pull product because of the level of financial literacy. But the mindset of Indian society is different and people do not want to think about these requirements. I am talking about the mindset today which may change tomorrow.
What will be the impact of revised charges on investors' savings?
The impact would be that those who make low contribution will be better off. Even for those who pay more it is not that the sky is the limit in respect of charges - there is a limit in absolute terms. Today, there are some commentators who feel that system is loaded in favour of the rich because in percentage terms the smaller investors are paying more in terms of charges.
When you talk about financial inclusion, do you mean to say that a pension plan should be opened with every bank account?
On financial inclusion there is a lot of publicity going around. But when they talk about banking products, they should also be taking about pension and insurance. Living too long is a serious threat to Indians because we have not made adequate provisions. We have always worried about dying too soon but have not made preparations for living too long. Ultimately, why do you want a bank account? It is to park your surplus funds.
Will extending the government scheme to contribute Rs 1,000 into every small investors account not put pressure on the Centre's finances?
If you start expenditure for this, it is actually an investment because money goes straight into the account of the pensioner. Secondly, there is zero leakage because the money cannot be spent and it goes into investment which, in turn, will have a spill over effects. We are not saying that it should go on for ever. It can be reviewed later.
What changes have you proposed for the PFRDA?
Basically, PFRDA will have to build more regulatory capacity. When you have eight or nine fund managers with Rs 10,000 crore it may not matter. But tomorrow when this goes to Rs 1 lakh crore with many more fund managers, a different regulatory capacity would be required.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Living-too-long-a-serious-threat-to-Indians/articleshow/9117883.cms
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Choose your own investment options, pension fund managers
If you are looking at building your retirement corpus, you can consider the New Pension System (NPS). Launched by the Indian government, the Tier-I scheme offered by NPS is a pension scheme that allows investors to choose their own investment options and pension fund managers.
Open to anyone between 18 and 55 years, a minimum of Rs 6,000 needs to be invested every year, until heshe turns 60. At maturity (60 years), investors would be required to invest a minimum of 40 per cent of the accumulated amount to purchase a life annuity. The remaining can be withdrawn in a lump sum or in a phased manner.
Investing Rs 6,000 every year at a 12 per cent interest rate, for the maximum term of 37 years, one would have collected a corpus of over Rs 3.65 crore. However, these returns are not guaranteed and depend on how the pension fund you choose (out of the designated seven) actually performs. Like any other pension scheme, NPS invests in government and other debt products. Its equity investments will be capped at 50 per cent.
At present, there aren’t many pension products to choose from. Besides the Public Provident Fund (PPF), there are just a couple of plans in the mutual fund and the unit-linked insurance pension products segment. Most insurance companies have pulled out their unit-linked products after the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (Irda) came up with a 4.5 per cent guaranteed returns mandate. However, the traditional retirement plans offered by insurance companies remain a good option with their built-in guarantees, and option for loans against the cash value of the policy.
While PPF remains a popular investment avenue, the restriction of investing Rs 70,000 every year works against it. There is no upper limit for investment in NPS and others.
However, it is with regard to fund management charges (FMC) that NPS really scores. While FMC for NPS is a mere 0.0009 per cent or 90 paise a lakh, it is one per cent or Rs 1,000 per lakh in case of mutual funds. Insurance companies charge up to 1.35 per cent or Rs 1,350 per lakh.
Many believe that the long lock-in period for the pension scheme works against NPS. PPFs and other existing pension plans that allow partial withdrawals are far more liquid. At present, all annuities coming out of pension products are taxable as income. It will be the same in case of NPS, too. Even in terms of tax benefits, tax free PPFs may be a better option than NPS, which at 12 per cent may not give attractive post-tax returns.
Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/choose-your-own-investment-options-pension-fund-managers/430483/
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
How to retire happy with Mutual funds
More importantly, he has planned for it too and is investing Rs 10,000 p.m. towards it. However, Somani is an isolated case and most youngsters keep postponing their retirement planning. “Many a times, investors are tied down with meeting short-term goals like wedding, buying a house and keep postponing retirement planning,” says Anup Bhaiya, MD and CEO, Money Honey Financial Services. And the solution is to do the financial planning in a holistic way. Remember, retirement planning is a subset of your overall financial planning.
START EARLY
There is another advantage of starting early that is known as the power of compounding (i.e., the money you save in the initial years generates compounded returns for a very long time). For example, to reach a retirement corpus of `1 crore, at 12% rate of interest, you will have to invest Rs 43,471 per month if you have only 10 years in hand. But if you have 35 years in hand, you will reach the same target by investing just Rs 1,555 per month. In other words, the 20s and 30s are probably the best time to plan for retirement — of course, along with other financial and career goals.
EQUITY ROUTE
The first thing that you need to decide is what corpus you would need at the time of retirement. “It is important to first quantify how much you will need to maintain your lifestyle at the time of retirement,” says Amar Pandit, CEO of My Financial Advisor. Quantify how much you need to spend to enjoy your current lifestyle. Assuming inflation in the 6-8% range in the long run, you can arrive at the amount you need at the time you retire.
Very high inflation on the one hand and the absence of a social security system on the other hand makes maintaining your lifestyle post retirement a big challenge. Therefore, it is imperative that the retirement corpus has to be invested in products that can generate maximum returns in long term. It is proved historically that equity generates maximum returns among all asset classes, so investors can use the equity funds/balanced funds to build their retirement corpus.
EQUITY FUNDS
Though you can invest directly in the stock market to generate your retirement corpus, the mutual fund route is more convenient. “The mutual fund route is more transparent and comes with the least costs. It also offers liquidity, making it a good candidate for long-term investment,” points out a wealth manager with a foreign bank.
BUILD A PORTFOLIO
“Depending on where you stand today and your risk-taking ability, you should construct a portfolio of funds with a long-term consistent track record,” explains Pandit. Most financial planners recommend diversified equity funds if you have more than 20 years to go for your retirement. Since Somani has full 30 years to retire, his retirement plan can be made of three equity mutual funds. “We recommended him to invest `10,000 per month through SIPs in three equity mutual funds namely, HDFC Equity Fund, Franklin Prima Fund and DSP Equity Fund,” says Bhaiya of Money Honey Financial Services.
The assumption here is simple. Assuming a 15% return from equities per annum for the next 30 years, `10,000 per month invested will give him a corpus of `6.92 crore. Assuming that Somani will shift his corpus entirely to debt at that age, and earn a 6% post-tax return, his interest income would be `3.46 lakh per month. Now, we come to the expense part. Somani’s current monthly expense is `30,000 per month. Assuming a 8% inflation, at the age of 55, his monthly ex-penses would be `3.02 lakh comfortably helping him retire peace-fully. Depending your risk-taking ability, you can either go for an ac-tively managed mid cap funds (i.e., for high risk takers) or go with a plain-vanilla index fund (ie for low risk takers).
BALANCED FUNDS
“Balanced funds also make good candidates for retirement planning since they offer good post-tax returns in the long term,” says Abhishek Gupta, a certified financial advisor with Mumbai-based Moat Wealth Advisors. This is because if the average equity component is kept above 65% (most of these balanced funds do it), there is no capital gains tax after a year of holding. He prefers HDFC Prudence Fund and Birla Sunlife 95 Fund amongst the balanced fund category.
ASSET ALLOCATION FUNDS
Asset allocation funds (where the fund managers move between equity and debt depending on the mar-ket conditions) are another option that can be considered. But not all financial planners prefer to go with these readymade tools. “Being fund of funds, the asset allocation funds are treated like debt funds and taxed accordingly,” points out Gupta. Instead, it makes sense to invest in the right combination of equity and debt funds and generate better post-tax returns than the fund of fund route.
MANAGE THE CORPUS
Building a retirement corpus is just one part of the game, managing the corpus post retirement is another ball game. The first part is to reduce the high-risk equity component slowly. “As you move closer to your retirement age, i.e., when you are 5-7 years away, shift the corpus gradually into hybrid products,” says Vishal Dhawan of Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors.
The next step is the use of systematic withdrawal plans (SWPs) offered by mutual funds to reduce your tax burden in the golden days. Please note that systematic withdrawal plan will ensure that the money in your hand is subject to capital gains tax whereas a pension income generated from other products is added to your income and taxed at the marginal rate.
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/mutual-funds/analysis/how-to-retire-happy-with-mutual-funds/articleshow/7490769.cms
